FINRA Manual: Contents
|View Whole Section||Text only||Print Manager||Link|
05-09 NASD Amends Rule Governing Predispute Arbitration with Customers (The compliance date of new Rule 3110(f)(1) requirements has been extended to June 1, 2005.)
Predispute Arbitration Agreements
Effective Date: May 1, 2005
The compliance date of new Rule 3110(f)(1) requirements has been extended to June 1, 2005. See the SEC's release at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nasd/34-51526.pdf
|SUGGESTED ROUTING||KEY TOPICS|
|Legal & Compliance
Books and Records
Predispute Arbitration Agreements
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved amendments to NASD Rule 3110(f) that require firms to modify their predispute arbitration agreements with customers to provide enhanced disclosure about the arbitration process.1 The amendments also: require members to provide copies of predispute arbitration agreements and relevant arbitration forum rules to customers upon request; clarify the use of certain limiting provisions; and require firms seeking to compel arbitration of claims initiated in court to arbitrate all of the claims contained in the complaint if the customer so requests. Rule 3110(f), as amended, is attached as Attachment A.
The effective date of this rule change is May 1, 2005. Predispute arbitration agreements will be governed by the version of Rule 3110(f) in effect at the time the agreement was executed, except that Rule 3110(f)(3) as amended applies to all new and existing agreements.Questions/Further Information
Questions regarding this Notice can be directed to Laura Gansler, Assistant General Counsel, Regulatory Policy and Oversight, at (202) 728-8275 or email@example.com; or Jean I. Feeney, Vice President and Chief Counsel, Dispute Resolution, at (202) 728-6959 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Background and Discussion
Many broker-dealers require that customers seeking to open accounts, particularly margin and option accounts or accounts with a checking or money market feature, agree in writing to arbitrate disputes concerning the account, typically in a forum sponsored by a self-regulatory organization (SRO). To ensure that customers are advised about what they are agreeing to when they sign predispute arbitration agreements, NASD Rule 3110(f)(1) requires that such agreements contain highlighted disclosure about the differences between arbitration and litigation, including notice that by agreeing to arbitrate their disputes, customers may be waiving certain rights that would be available in court.
Despite these precautions, investor groups have expressed concern that the current disclosure is inadequate, and is not written in plain English. To address these concerns, NASD has amended Rule 3110(f)(1) to make the required disclosure easier to understand, and to include new disclosure that the rules of some arbitration forums may impose time limits for bringing claims in arbitration, and that, in some cases, claims that are ineligible for arbitration may be brought in court. The amendment also requires that the agreement clearly state that the parties agree that the rules of the arbitration forum in which a claim is brought, and any amendments thereto, are incorporated into the parties' agreement. This provision is intended to ensure that the rules of a forum apply to cases brought in that forum and eliminate the need to execute new agreements each time a forum changes its rules. Accordingly, if a customer files a complaint in the NASD arbitration forum, NASD's arbitration rules would apply in all respects to the agreement.
Firms are required to use the new disclosure language in all new customer account agreements containing predispute arbitration agreements as of May 1, 2005. The rule change does not require firms to modify or replace existing agreements with current customers. The specific language that must be used, and the manner in which it must be presented, is found in Rule 3110(f)(1)(A)-(G), as amended.
Delivery and Acknowledgment of Predispute Arbitration Clause at Time of Signing
NASD Rule 3110(f)(2) requires that predispute arbitration agreements contain a highlighted statement indicating that the agreement contains an arbitration clause and specifying at what page and paragraph the arbitration clause is located. It also requires that firms provide a copy of the predispute arbitration agreement to the customer, who must in turn acknowledge receipt of the agreement in writing, either on the agreement itself or on a separate document. However, the rule was vague as to when the delivery and acknowledgement must occur. New paragraph (f)(2)(B) of Rule 3110 makes clear that the delivery and customer acknowledgement of the agreement must take place at the time of signing.
New Requirement That Members Provide Copies of Customer Agreements and Information Regarding Arbitration Forums to Customers upon Request
In addition to the delivery requirement at the time of signing, Rule 3110(f)(3) has been amended to require that, within ten days of receiving a customer request, firms must provide the customer with a copy of any predispute arbitration agreement clause or agreement that the customer had signed. NASD has learned that in some instances, firms were refusing to provide copies of agreements to customers who requested them after a dispute arose, making it difficult for customers who had misplaced their original copies to assess their rights and obligations under the agreement. The provision also requires that, if a firm does not have a copy of an agreement requested by a customer, it must inform the customer of that fact. NASD fully expects firms to retain copies of such agreements, as required by NASD rules. However, if for some reason, whether through an act of nature, human error, or otherwise, a member is unable to comply with the customer's request, Rule 3110(f)(3), as amended, requires firms to inform the customer of that fact, rather than simply failing to respond to the customer's request.
Restrictions on Provisions That Limit Rights and Remedies
Rule 3110(f)(4)(A) currently prohibits the use of provisions in predispute arbitration agreements that limit a customer's rights or remedies, or limit the ability of an arbitrator to make an award. To amplify on this provision, the amendments provide that predispute arbitration agreements may not include any condition that would: (i) limit or contradict the rules of any SRO; (ii) limit the ability of a party to file any claim in arbitration; (iii) limit the ability of a party to file any claim in court that could otherwise be filed in court under the rules of the forum(s) in which a claim may be filed under the agreement; or (iv) limit the ability of arbitrators to make any award. These amendments are intended to, among other things, address provisions that attempt to circumvent NASD Rule 10304, governing the eligibility of claims in arbitration.
NASD originally proposed to include a provision explicitly prohibiting the use of arbitrary choice-of-law provisions in predispute arbitration agreements in order to indirectly deprive customers of rights and remedies to which they would otherwise be entitled under applicable state law. However, after reviewing the numerous comments received by the SEC on the proposal, NASD concluded that the proposed provision could be interpreted to undermine protections currently afforded investors under state law. Therefore, NASD withdrew the provision, but reminds firms that, as it has in the past, NASD will continue to interpret Rule 3110(f)(4)(A) to require that, if a choice-of-law provision is used, there must be an adequate nexus between the law chosen and the transaction or parties at issue in accordance with NASD Notices to Members 95-85 and 95-16.
NASD has also amended Rule 3110(f) to require members seeking to compel arbitration of claims filed in court to agree to arbitrate all of the claims contained in the complaint if the customer so requests, even if some of the claims would otherwise be ineligible for arbitration under NASD Rule 10304. The SEC also has approved NASD's proposal to amend Rule 10304 to provide that, by requesting dismissal of a claim on eligibility grounds in the NASD forum, the requesting party is agreeing that the party that filed the dismissed claim may withdraw all related claims without prejudice and may pursue all of the claims in court.2 The purpose of these two provisions is to protect investors against involuntary bifurcation of claims.
Effective Date Provisions
The amendments to NASD Rule 3110(f) require various changes to the customer agreements used by NASD member firms. In order to provide enough time for firms to modify customer agreements, the rule change will take effect on May 1, 2005, which is 90 days from the date of this Notice. The rule change does not require changes to existing agreements. Predispute arbitration agreements will be governed by the version of Rule 3110(f) in effect at the time the agreement was executed, except that Rule 3110(f)(3) as amended applies to all new and existing agreements.
1 SEC Rel. No. 34-50713 (Nov. 22, 2004), 69 Fed. Reg. 70293 (Dec. 3, 2004) (SR-NASD-98-74).
2 Specifically, NASD has amended Rule 10304 to provide explicitly that arbitrators, rather than the courts, determine the eligibility of claims, and that a party requesting dismissal of a claim on eligibility grounds in NASD's forum agrees that the party that filed the dismissed claim may withdraw all related claims without prejudice and may pursue all of the claims in court. Claims filed in court pursuant to this rule would still be subject to applicable statutes of limitation. See SEC Rel. No. 34-50714 (Nov. 22, 2004), 69 Fed. Reg. 69971 (Dec. 1, 2004) (SR-NASD-2003-101). See also Notice to Members 05-xx.
3000. Responsibilities Relating to Associated Persons, Employees, and Others' Employees
3110. Books and Records
This agreement contains a predispute arbitration clause. By signing an arbitration agreement the parties agree as follows: