FINRA Manual: Contents
FINRA Manual
Notices
1990
90-84 NASDAQ National Market System (NASDAQ/NMS) Additions, Changes, and Deletions As of November 13,
90-82 Inclusion of Non-SRO Arbitration Forum as an Alternative Forum in Predispute Arbitration Agreements.
90-81 Amendments to the Code of Procedure to Change the Disciplinary Process and Provide That Decisions of the National Business Conduct Committee Are Final Actions of the NASD
90-79 Receipt of Differential Compensation for Soliciting Proxies in Partnership Roll-Ups; Last Date for Comments: January 15,
90-78 NASDAQ National Market System (NASDAQ/NMS) Additions, Changes, and Deletions As of October 11,
90-74 Proposed Amendment to Article IV, Section 1 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice Re: the Suspension of the Membership of Any Member or of the Registration of a Person Associated With a Member for a Definite Period Assessed As a Penalty For a Rule Violation;
90-73 Proposed Amendment to Article III, Section 28 of the Rules of Fair Practice Re: Associated Person Notifying Employer Prior to Opening Securities Account With Another Member; Last Voting Date: Decembers 5,
90-71 NASDAQ National Market System (NASDAQ/NMS) Additions, Changes, and Deletions As of September 13,
90-69 Amendment to Schedule C of the NASD By-Laws Regarding Use of the Modified General Securities Representative Examination to Qualify Persons Registered With The Securities Association of the United Kingdom, Effective Immediately
90-68 Amendment to Schedule C of the NASD By-Laws Regarding Requalification by Examination For Persons Whose Registration Has Been Revoked, Effective October 1,
90-65 Suggested Customer Suitability Statement and Agreement to Purchase Form for Members' Compliance With SEC Rule 15c2-6
90-64 Amendments to the NASD By-Laws and to Schedule B Thereof to Modify the Size and Composition of the Board of Governors and the Number and Configuration of the Districts, Effective September 4,
90-63 Amendment to Proposed Rule Re: Disclosure of Payment for Order Flow Practices On Customer Confirmations; Last Voting Date: November 5,
90-61 Proposed Amendments to Article III, Section 5(b) and Article IV, Sections 3 and 4 of the NASD By-Laws, and Article IV, Section 5 and Article V, Sections 1 and 3 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice Re: Retention of Jurisdiction Over Member Firms and Associa
90-57 Implementation of Amendment to Rules of Practice and Procedures for the Small Order Execution System Re: Market Makers' Entry of Agency Orders into SOES, Effective July 27,
90-56 Proposed Amendments to Subsections (b) "Definitions" and (d) ("Sales Charge Rule") of Article III, Section 26 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice Re: Regulation By the NASD of Mutual Fund Asset-Based Sales Charges; Last Voting
90-52 SEC Approval of Amendments to Article III, Sections 2 and 21 (c) of the Rules of Fair Practice Re: Customer Account Information
90-51 SEC Approval of Amendment to Board of Governors' Interpretation on Prompt Receipt and Delivery of Securities
90-50 Proposed Amendment to Article III, Section 28 of the Rules of Fair Practice Re: Associated Person Notifying and Obtaining Approval of Employer Prior to Opening Securities Account With Another Member; Last Date for Comment: September 4,
90-45 SEC Approval to Articles II and III of the NASD's Code of Procedure Regarding Board of Governors and Committee Proceedings in Disciplinary Actions, Effective August 1,
90-44 SEC Approval of Amendment to Code of Procedure Regarding Summary Remedial Proceedings, Effective July 1,
90-43 Proposed Amendment to Part I of Schedule C to the NASD By-Laws Regarding Written Notification About Certain Events; Last Date for Comment: August 3,
90-40 SEC Approval of an Amendment to Schedule H to the NASD By-Laws Requiring Members to Demonstrate Compliance With Rule 15c2-11 Before Initiating Quotations in a Quotation Medium
90-39 Amendments to Schedule E to the NASD By-Laws Regarding Potential Conflicts of Interest; Last Date for Comment: July 5,
90-38 Proposed Concept for Continuing Assessment of Registered Representatives in the Form of Amendment to Part HI, Section (1)(d) of Schedule C to the NASD By-Laws; Last Date for Comment: July 31,
90-36 Proposed Amendments to the NASD By-Laws Implementing the Recommendations of the Special Committee on NASD Structure and Governance; Last Voting Date: July 5,
90-29 SEC Approval of New Schedule I to the NASD By-Laws Establishing and Setting Rules for The PORTAL^sup|SM^/sup| Market for Primary Distributions and Secondary Trading of Private Placements
90-27 Proposed Amendment to Article III, Section 26 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice Re: Disclosure of Deferred Sales Charges on Confirmations of the Sale of Investment Company Shares; Last Voting Date: June 5,
90-26 Proposed Amendments to Subsections (b)(4) and (d) of Article III, Section 26 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice Re: Regulation of Asset-Based Sales Charges by the NASD; Last Date for Comment: May 31,
90-23 Administrative Conversion of the Series 7 General Securities Representative Examination to PLATO* Computer-Based Delivery
90-20 Proposed Amendments to Article III, Section 5(b) and Article IV, Sections 3 and 4 of The NASD By-Laws, and Article IV, Section 5 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice; Last Date for Comment: May 5,
90-19 Proposed Amendments to the NASD By-Laws and Code of Procedure to Implement The Recommendations of the Special Committee on NASD Structure and Governance; Last Date for Comment: April 30,
90-17 NASDAQ National Market System (NASDAQ/NMS) Additions, Changes, and Deletions As of February 9,
90-14 Proposed Amendments to Article III, Section 35 of NASD's Rules of Fair Parctice Re:Communications With the Public;Last Voting Date:April 5,
90-12 Proposed Amendments to Article III, Sections 2 and 21 (c) of the Rules of Fair Practice Re: Customer Account Information; Last Voting Date: April 5,
90-11 Proposed Amendment Re: Disclosure of Payment for Order Flow Practices on Customer Confirmations; Last Voting Date: April 5,
90-9 Mandatory Participation by Self-Clearing Firms in the Automated Confirmation Transaction (ACT) Service Begins March 1,
| View Whole Section | Text only | Print Manager | Link |
![]() | NASD Rules (1 link) | ![]() |
90-11 Proposed Amendment Re: Disclosure of Payment for Order Flow Practices on Customer Confirmations; Last Voting Date: April 5,
SUGGESTED ROUTING* |
Senior Management |
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
MAIL VOTE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
To improve disclosure of broker-dealer compensation for order flow and to make the disclosure more uniform, the NASD Board of Governors approved a change to the NASD Rules of Fair Practice on which members are requested to vote. The change would require specific language to appear in bold typeface in a prominent location on each applicable customer confirmation disclosing the kind of compensation arrangements. Prior to becoming effective, the change must be filed with and approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The text of the proposed change follows this notice.
BACKGROUND AND EXPLANATION
In the past several months, the subject of broker-dealer compensation for sending customer orders to particular market makers has come under scrutiny by the NASD and the Securities and Exchange Commission. In June 1989, the NASD issued a questionnaire to market makers that, among other things, requested information about their "hard dollar" payment practices. In July 1989, the SEC hosted the "Roundtable on Commission Dollar and Payment For Order Flow Practices," which featured commentators from broker-dealers, self-regulatory organizations, money managers, and pension plan sponsors.
The NASD survey and SEC roundtable showed that, although payment for order flow practices exist, they are generally well documented in broker-dealer records and are generally disclosed to customers with boiler-plate language on the back of confirmations. In order to study the issue further and to determine if any NASD regulatory action were warranted, the NASD formed a special subcommittee of the Trading Committee. The subcommittee reviewed current compensation practices and found that, while disclosure to customers was being made, the quality and method of disclosure varied from firm to firm.
In the interest of improving disclosure to customers and making it more uniform, the subcommittee recommended, and the NASD Board of Governors approved, a change to the NASD Rules of Fair Practice, Article III, Section 12, "Disclosure on Confirmations." The Board of Governors believes that payment for order flow practices should be more specifically disclosed and highlighted on customer confirmations and that members should again be reminded of their obligations to assure best execution for customer trades processed under these arrangements.
Disclosure of Compensation
Rule 10b-10 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 prescribes information that a broker or dealer must disclose to its customer on the confirmation form. The rule requires, among other things, that the broker-dealer disclose whether additional remuneration has been or will be received in connection with a transaction, and that the source and amount of such payment be furnished to the customer upon written request.1 Under this rule, therefore, payments received by a retail firm from a market maker in return for directing its order flow to the market maker is considered additional compensation and must be disclosed to the customer. The NASD Board of Governors believes that this disclosure must be more specifically stated than is the current practice and that the following language must appear in bold typeface, in a prominent location, on each customer confirmation transaction that has been subject to a compensation plan:
The firm may receive remuneration for directing orders to a particular broker or dealer, through which your transaction is executed. Such remuneration is considered compensation to us and the source and amount of any compensation will be disclosed upon request.
The Board believes that the proposed language, appearing prominently in bold print on customer confirmations, will more clearly disclose these compensation arrangements. Therefore, it approved submitting the rule change to the SEC for approval, pending membership vote on the change.
Best Execution
The Interpretation of the Board of Governors on Execution of Retail Transactions,2 the "Best Execution Interpretation," requires that:
[i]n any transaction for or with a customer, a member and persons associated with a member shall ... buy or sell ... so that the resultant price to the customer is as favorable as possible under prevailing market conditions.
In accordance with longstanding NASD policy, this requirement is particularly applicable to situations in which firms direct their order flow to a selected dealer. Although examinations by the NASD indicate that firms that have entered into agreements for payment for order flow are obtaining the best execution of their customers' transactions, it is important for all firms to assure that they continue to obtain the best execution of trades subject to these arrangements. NASD examiners will continue to review this area during on-site examinations to ensure ongoing compliance.
The NASD Board of Governors believes this change to the Rules of Fair Practice is necessary and appropriate and recommends that members vote their approval. Please mark the attached ballot according to your convictions and return it in the enclosed, stamped envelope to The Corporation Trust Company. Ballots must be postmarked no later than April 5, 1990.
Questions or comments regarding this notice may be directed to P. William Hotchkiss in the Surveillance Department at (202) 728-8235.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE III, SECTION 12, NASD RULES OF FAIR PRACTICE
(Note: New language is underlined)
Section 12 (b) A member that receives compensation for sending customer orders to a particular market center or market maker must give or send to each customer, at or before the completion of each transaction, written notification disclosing, in bold print:
The firm may receive remuneration for directing orders to a particular broker or dealer, through which your transaction is executed. Such remuneration is considered compensation to us and the source and amount of any compensation will be disclosed upon request.
1Rule 10b-10(a)(7), 17 CFR ยง240.10b-10(a)(7).
2NASD Manual (CCH) p.2037.
Help
Corporate Organization


